Red Hat (RHT) investors should be worried about a growth rate lower than reported in previous quarters. Don’t worry… yet. The apples-to-apples trailing-12-month growth rate was about 35% in March 2007 so 28% for the most recent quarter does not seem like anything to be worried about, given the current perceived IT spending slowdown and the natural gravity effect all high flyers experience. The September 2007 trailing 12-month will probably come in around 30% even after we backcast for independent Metamatrix results in 2006.
Red Hat is guiding to 23–24% growth in the current quarter so the trailing-12-month number is in danger of falling below 30% by the end of the year if there is any kind of minor hiccup. But Red Hat management said that the way long-term contracts are handled differently quarter-by-quarter affects these growth rates and that there is good news in bookings “off the balance sheet.†Ok? Give ‘em a quarter; they have been straight with us up until now.
They did publicize bonus structures for the former JBoss guys that in retrospect were wildly optimistic. But I do not believe that was purposeful on Red Hat’s part. So if you insist on worrying, be concerned that management launched into yet another rationalization of that 2006 middleware acquisition. Red Hat has made organizational changes to accelerate JBoss’ growth in the second half of this fiscal year, which ends next February. (As an aside, to further justify its JBoss acquisition, Red Hat management quoted an application deployment software forecast from IDC for 2007–2011 that was significantly higher than my last forecast for that market while at IDC. I am guessing IDC changed the definition of application deployment software after I left, maybe to count non-price-list software integrated into Windows. But JBoss was never going to get a big piece of the $9.5 billion to be spent on application deployment software in 2011 (my number) or $12 billion (the current IDC number according to Red Hat) for two reasons. First, that IDC forecast is 25% legacy-hardware-based and composed of large categories such as transaction monitors where JBoss does not even compete. Second, of course, it is the JBoss/Apache/open-source and Microsoft models of application deployment software commoditization and convergence that makes my forecast so much lower than IDC’s current alleged prediction.)
Management also explained how Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) both competes with and cooperates with VMware. They also explained the VPro desktop virtualization product that Red Hat is working on with Intel (INTL). Given Red Hat’s dominance already of the Linux space, the so-called desktop virtualization space is something Red Hat should concentrate on. The absurdity of the term “desktop virtualization,†which I will post about in a few days, does not change the fact that the opportunity for managing non-desktop diskless appliances is huge.
Management also announced that the RHX software exchange will be enhanced by a partner portal this quarter. This will provide partners, many of whom are small understaffed open source (OSS) software providers, much needed ecommerce support for their products. Such partner products will also be accessible to a common Red Hat service experience.
I was sorry to see Red Hat step into the government-sponsored issue, seeming to be happy about government mandates worldwide that preclude competitors. This attitude is from the school of thought that says “if you can’t beat Microsoft in the marketplace (against whom Red Hat doesn’t really compete if you study the rest of its statistics), hire a lobbyist, make a political contribution, and ask for a government hand-out†in terms of a wired contract or stifling regulation. Acceptance of that big-company attitude, something you expect of IBM, is the biggest concern to come out of Red Hat’s latest quarterly conference call.
–Dennis Byron
Tags: open source software, Linux, virtualization, middleware
Comments on this entry are closed.