Sun after September 5: “Oh, did we forget to mention Microsoft?”

by Dennis Byron on September 13, 2007

On Sep­tem­ber 5 Sun (now JAVA on the ticker) met with NYC finan­cial ana­lysts cov­er­ing a wide range of issues. The meet­ing had a heavy empha­sis on part­ner­ing and chan­nels as the two key tac­tics that will revive growth for Sun’s sys­tems, stor­age and net­work­ing busi­nesses. There were for­mal pre­sen­ta­tions by Sun exec­u­tives and ques­tions from the ana­lysts about the IBM (IBM) and Intel (INTC) part­ner­ing agree­ments as well as an agree­ment with Juniper Net­works (JNPR).

On Sep­tem­ber 5th, I didn’t hear any men­tion of or ques­tions about another “long-time” Sun part­ner, Microsoft (40 months being a long time in the Inter­net era). Yet the first major part­ner­ing news out of Sun, post the NYC meet­ing, is the Sep­tem­ber 12 announce­ment dra­mat­i­cally expand­ing the Microsoft/Sun relationship.

Sun is to become a Win­dows Server OEM across the entirety of Sun’s prod­uct line. Pre­vi­ously Sun cer­ti­fied Win­dows on x64 sys­tems but now Sun will pre-install the tech­nol­ogy. The deal does not include other Win­dows com­po­nents but this arrange­ment is sim­i­lar to what Microsoft does with other hard­ware part­ners. Sys­tems inte­gra­tors and other Microsoft part­ners add the other Win­dows com­po­nents such as Exchange, Share­Point and so forth. As an exam­ple of how part­ners might use the pair, they said that together they will be imple­ment­ing AT&T’s inter­ac­tive TV on a Sun/Windows platform.

In addi­tion, on Sep­tem­ber 5, the tech­nol­ogy topic of the day was vir­tu­al­iza­tion. Again, there was no men­tion of Microsoft. On Sep­tem­ber 12, Sun and Microsoft said the two com­pa­nies would col­lab­o­rate closely on cross-platform vir­tu­al­iza­tion. To be fair, at the 9/5/2007 NYC meet­ing, Jonathan Schwartz did say that most vir­tu­al­iza­tion today is about Win­dows work­group servers and com­pared Solaris as a vir­tu­al­iza­tion plat­form against Win­dows and Red Hat (RHT) Enter­prise Linux. Because Solaris has vir­tu­al­iza­tion built in, even into its stor­age solu­tions, the deal makes sense for Microsoft. And the growth of the Sun x64 busi­ness pro­vides Microsoft a good chan­nel for its prod­ucts, per­haps bal­anc­ing any busi­ness it might be los­ing to Linux/Unix servers from hard­ware dis­trib­u­tors that were for­merly exclu­sively Win­dows deal­ers. Microsoft cited recent IDC num­bers on why Sun would care to hook up with peo­ple that want Windows.

Sun said twice that 100% of its cus­tomers use both Solaris and Win­dows; I have a prob­lem with that sta­tis­tic log­i­cally (I am check­ing with Sun on its mean­ing) but it proves our research find­ings that users really want open choice, not just open source or just Microsoft.

This agree­ment rep­re­sents a con­tin­u­a­tion of work on web ser­vices, inter­op­er­abil­ity, iden­tity man­age­ment, thin clients, and other tech­nolo­gies since the big Sun/Microsoft legal set­tle­ment in 2004. Specif­i­cally Sun incor­po­rated Microsoft’s stor­age APIs and Microsoft sys­tems man­age­ment APIs, and the two did a lot of .NET/J2EE –that’s what the Sun guy called it—interoperability efforts.

So why was there no men­tion of Microsoft by Sun on Sep­tem­ber 5th?

I won­der if it is because of the ongo­ing Open Source Ini­tia­tive con­tro­versy with Microsoft over the MS-PL license. Or is it because Bill Gates gave his going-away speech to Microsoft employ­ees last week in Seat­tle and Jonathan did not want to pre-empt Gates’ chance to sing Sun’s praises. Maybe it’s because Sun is pay­ing so much to lobby gov­ern­ments all over the world in favor of the Open Doc­u­ment For­mat, which com­petes with Microsoft’s OOXML.
Does it have any­thing to do with left-wing anti-war adver­tis­ing by the Demo­c­ra­tic party or Chris­t­ian con­ser­vatism (break­ing the old rule about pol­i­tics and reli­gion in one sentence)?

Or could it sim­ply be that Microsoft is not a strate­gic part­ner in Sun’s opin­ion, despite the Sep­tem­ber 12 PR? Sun said in NYC that strate­gi­cally it does not want to “retail other company’s tech­nolo­gies.” But no, that’s too sim­ple and straight­for­ward a reason.

– Den­nis Byron

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

{ 1 comment }

Dennis Byron September 13, 2007 at 6:19 PM

Update: Sun has replied to clarify the statistic about “100% of its customers use both Solaris and Windows.” As I suspected it is not a literal survey finding but based on the assumption that “every company has Windows somewhere.” The analysis that that’s why users want open choice stands.

Comments on this entry are closed.

{ 1 trackback }

Previous post:

Next post: