Happy New Year from Oracle to investors

by Dennis Byron on December 19, 2007

So what kind of year did Ora­cle have? Ora­cle doesn’t think of it this way but the year ended for it on Nov 30, 2007. I say that because IBM and SAP and many other large soft­ware sup­pli­ers (except the obvi­ous, the largest) report their annual results on a calendar-year basis. I may be stat­ing the obvi­ous but it is eas­ier for peo­ple who build invest­ment research mod­els to adjust Oracle’s trail­ing 12 months end­ing Nov 30 to the other lead­ers than to adjust all the oth­ers to Oracle’s May 31 fis­cal year ending.

After back­cast­ing for Oracle’s acqui­si­tions in 2006 and 2007, Research 2.0 esti­mates that the database/application soft­ware mar­ket leader grew all types of rev­enue about 16% in the 12 months end­ing Novem­ber 30, 2007 vs. the 12 months end­ing Nov. 30, 2006. The dif­fer­ence between our esti­mate and the higher growth rate reported in press releases is due to the fact that the press release does not take into account the tim­ing of such acqui­si­tions as Hype­r­ion, Agile, Stel­lent, SPL World­group, Meta­Solv and oth­ers. Ora­cle itself nor­mal­izes for this dif­fer­ence in its most recent 10-K fil­ing, say­ing that it grew its pro­forma rev­enue 13.0% in the 12 months end­ing May 31, 2007 (vs. the 12 months end­ing May 31, 2006). With our esti­mate of 16% trailing-12-month growth six months later, the com­pany cer­tainly kept the nee­dle going in the right direction.

The com­pany high­lighted soft­ware license growth rates, as opposed to what it calls “license updates and prod­uct sup­port” in its con­fer­ence call. It looks like there is very aggres­sive cross sell­ing to all of its new installed base in progress. Ora­cle says there is still a lot of oppor­tu­nity ahead of it. Divid­ing license rev­enue from sup­port rev­enue gets a lit­tle tricky because every com­pany accounts for the two a lit­tle dif­fer­ently. We believe it makes more sense to look at the com­bi­na­tion of the two for the rea­sons out­lined in the most recent Research 2.0 report on Ora­cle (and all our soft­ware analyses).

Our long-term val­u­a­tion esti­mate that Ora­cle is now fairly priced in the low $20s, as out­lined in that Research 2.0 report, holds because it already reflected the growth that Ora­cle real­ized in its Quar­ter 2 and gave guid­ance to for the rest of its fis­cal year. It looks like the mar­ket saw these results com­ing but it’s always nice when the­ory matches reality.

As for com­peti­tors, we won’t know for sure until Jan­u­ary when we hear from IBM, SAP and get the first 6 months of FY2008 results from Microsoft. But Ora­cle con­tin­ued to out­grow IBM, and has pulled neck and neck with SAP in terms of com­pany growth rates. Exchange rates make the com­par­i­son tricky how­ever. More impor­tant, while the ini­tial view in this blog­post looks at the two com­pa­nies over­all, the Research 2.0 report on Ora­cle looks at the appli­ca­tions busi­nesses head to head.

Ora­cle is almost keep­ing pace with Microsoft. Microsoft said in its recent Q1 con­fer­ence call that its growth rate was unusu­ally high so pre­sum­ably that state­ment applies to Microsoft’s 24% year to date growth as well. If that growth rate comes down a bit after the fourth cal­en­dar quar­ter, the two soft­ware sup­pli­ers’ growth rates will be more com­pa­ra­ble. Again, it is more impor­tant to look at Research 2.0’s esti­mates of how Ora­cle ERP does against Microsoft ERP, how stand­alone Ora­cle appli­ca­tions do against stand­alone Microsoft appli­ca­tions, and so forth. But you’ll have a hard time find­ing any­thing to com­plain about over your eggnog in these results.

– Den­nis Byron

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: