IBM didn’t buy enough software from itself in 2007.

by Dennis Byron on January 23, 2008

As I read it, for IBM (IBM) 2007 rep­re­sented the first year this decade that the growth rate in inter­nal soft­ware rev­enue (e.g., the Soft­ware Group from Global Tech­nol­ogy Ser­vices) dipped down into sin­gle dig­its. In 2004 and 2006, the inter­nal growth rate was twice the exter­nal rate at 12% and 14% respec­tively. In 2003 the inter­nal growth was three the times the exter­nal growth rate at 32%. In 2002, soft­ware rev­enue from down the hall grew 25%, rep­re­sent­ing a large per­cent­age of the growth of the IBM Soft­ware Group that year.

I’m not sure how to inter­pret that. Maybe some­how when IBM sells itself soft­ware it adjusts for exchange rates in a way you can’t do with real money. There­fore the inter­nal growth rates are closer to the con­stant cur­rency rates that IBM reports. I also sus­pect it has some­thing to do with the tran­si­tional period vis a vis IBM main­frames (a large per­cent­age of IBM soft­ware sold deploys on mainframes).

I know part of the rea­son is because the num­bers I’m using for com­par­i­son (from the IBM Investor Rela­tions page) are not back­cast for IBM’s soft­ware acqui­si­tions. That tends to inflate the exter­nal growth-rate num­ber vs. mar­ket real­ity. Using a pure apples-to-apples com­par­i­son to take into account the 2006 acqui­si­tions of Filenet, Inter­net Secu­rity Sys­tems, MRO, Val­lent and so forth might reduce the GAAP-compliant exter­nal growth rate of 10% down a point or two. But it would still be higher than the 7% growth in inter­nal soft­ware sales.

Maybe the boom­ing ser­vices groups are buy­ing some­one else’s soft­ware, when they win an out­sourc­ing or man­age­ment con­sult­ing con­tract. I recall a story—surely just a story—about for­mer CEO Lou Ger­st­ner writ­ing one too many seven-figure checks to that com­pany out in Islandia and imme­di­ately send­ing some­one out to acquire Tivoli. Who’s look­ing at the out­go­ing checks these days?

Or maybe open source soft­ware (OSS) is being used in a lot of the con­tracts won by the IBM ser­vices divi­sions. As I have researched and reported in depth, OSS does not mean “free” unless you have a bunch of highly trained and highly moti­vated com­puter sci­en­tists on staff. With­out expert staff, it is very hard to main­tain and upgrade OSS with­out a ser­vice con­tract from some­one. There are very few orga­ni­za­tions that have that kind of exper­tise hang­ing around but Big Blue’s ser­vices orga­ni­za­tion is def­i­nitely one that does. Wouldn’t that be interesting?

Tags: , , , , , ,

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: