In comparing proprietary software vs. open source software (OSS), there’s no competition.

by Dennis Byron on January 24, 2008

In the so-called bat­tle between pro­pri­etary (also called closed-source) soft­ware com­pa­nies and open source soft­ware (OSS) com­pa­nies, there’s no com­pe­ti­tion. We don’t mean one set of com­pa­nies is bet­ter than the other. We just mean that there is not two sep­a­rate sets of com­pa­nies argu­ing over the OSS idea.

The lead­ing soft­ware sup­pli­ers, with the excep­tion of Microsoft (MSFT), long ago bought into OSS terms and con­di­tions and devel­op­ment tech­niques. IBM (IBM), Ora­cle (ORCL) and so forth have been big users of OSS for years as well as the main spon­sors of efforts such as the Apache Soft­ware Foun­da­tion, the Linux Foun­da­tion, and so forth pro­vid­ing both hard cash and in-kind con­tri­bu­tions. Now the lead­ing soft­ware sup­pli­ers are reap­ing the rewards in rev­enue. Microsoft got on board in 2007, has already had two of its licenses approved by the Open Source Ini­tia­tive and even is coop­er­at­ing with the Samba project (albeit through some intrigu­ing cut-out pro­ce­dure that would take John le Carré to explain).

The “bat­tle” between open and pro­pri­etary, which was pretty much con­trived by a few blog­gers for OSS-based star­tups in the first place, doesn’t exist.

Now we’ve put some hard num­bers behind that opin­ion. For exam­ple, we esti­mate IBM real­ized as much OSS-centric rev­enue in 2007 as Red Hat (RHT). A report on our research has been released over at ebizq.net. Over at Infoworld, Bill Sny­der gives the report a look from the OSS VC’s point of view, echo­ing an opin­ion we have noted here at Research 2.0 in the past, most recently around the first of the month.

The ebizQ arti­cle looks at the ques­tion “Who are lead­ers in OSS mar­ket pen­e­tra­tion?” The answer, as one of the article’s head­lines says: “The Money was Spent with IBM, Sun and Ora­cle as Well as Red Hat, Mozilla and mySQL.” More impor­tant, we find IT users just want “good soft­ware that doesn’t break often. And when it does, they want a sub­stan­tial com­pany avail­able to fix it.” The report, avail­able for free down­load, also looks at how the idea of OSS mar­ket “lead­er­ship” should be calculated.

Now the blo­gos­phere is going to have to find another con­tro­versy to obsess about.–Dennis Byron

Tags: , , , , , ,

Previous post:

Next post: