Looks like violent agreement with ZD-Net open source bloggers

by Dennis Byron on January 26, 2008

I am not sure why my last post was shoe-horned into this ZDNet blog­post con­cern­ing Dream­works, Via­com, the NY Times and Wall St. fairy tales but “Thanks for spelling my name right.”

It is hard to fol­low the ZDNet blog­gers’ thought process because a state­ment about Busi­ness­Week and Forbes read­ers links to InfoWorld and a state­ment about my analy­sis of the Sun (JAVA)-MySQL deal links to C-Net. (Here is my actual analy­sis as opposed to Mar­tin LaMonica’s news story.)

The only line in my Research 2.0 post that sort of relates to what I think the ZD-Net guys are say­ing is “The lead­ing soft­ware sup­pli­ers, with the excep­tion of Microsoft (MSFT), long ago bought into OSS terms and con­di­tions and devel­op­ment techniques.”

At least rel­a­tive to open source, isn’t that the same thing the two ZDNet OSS blog­gers are say­ing? I can’t speak to their points about Busi­ness­Week, Forbes, Con­necti­cut and New Jer­sey. It’s win­ter here on the Cape Cod; all those folks have gone home.–Dennis Byron

Tags: , , , , ,

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: