Microsoft keeps trying to put its open source background in the background

by Dennis Byron on February 21, 2008

As we’ve been not­ing since mid-2007, Microsoft (MSFT) is mak­ing every effort to put its anti-open-source bag­gage behind it. This is cov­ered in detail in our annual Microsoft report released in Decem­ber. On Feb­ru­ary 21, Microsoft announced sweep­ing open-source inter­op­er­abil­ity “prin­ci­ples” related to its vol­ume soft­ware prod­ucts (Win­dows Vista, the .NET Frame­work, Win­dows Server 2008, SQL Server 2008, Office 2007, Exchange Server 2007, and Office Share­Point Server 2007) that basi­cally put its agree­ments with the Euro­pean Union Com­pet­i­tive Com­mis­sion, announced in Octo­ber 2007, into Microspeak.

The announce­ment has three implications:

First, pre­vi­ous tac­ti­cal oppo­si­tion to open source soft­ware (OSS) has been a dis­trac­tion to Microsoft’s “Soft­ware Plus Ser­vice” strat­egy, which hope­fully will become more about pro­vid­ing IT and busi­ness ser­vices than mundame closed or open tech­nol­ogy terms and con­di­tions. This means “Soft­ware Plus Ser­vice” is mis­named (but don’t get hung up on words, as the U.S. pres­i­den­tial can­di­dates are say­ing to each other). The Soft­ware Plus Ser­vice strat­egy has been a work in progress since Ray Ozzie joined Microsoft and drop­ping all the anti-OSS tac­tics makes that clearer to investors.

Sec­ond, although at the Feb­ru­ary 21 press con­fer­ence Microsoft specif­i­cally said this announce­ment had noth­ing to do with the pro­posed Yahoo (YHOO) acqui­si­tion, that acqui­si­tion has every­thing to do with bring­ing Microsoft ser­vices to con­sumers just as most of the cur­rent avail­able Microsoft “Live” ser­vices sup­port enter­prises. Microsoft is uniquely posi­tioned to sup­port both enter­prises and con­sumers. More impor­tantly, it can sup­port each indi­vid­ual in his or her enter­prise and con­sumer roles as those roles change dur­ing the day.

Third, the announce­ment cov­ers all inter­faces used by Microsoft itself in tying its vol­ume prod­ucts to “other Microsoft prod­ucts.” That means it will be eas­ier for open source soft­ware (OSS) providers to con­nect to the BizTalk inte­gra­tion engine (if that’s con­sid­ered sep­a­rate from Win­dows Server 2008), the Greats Plains her­itage appli­ca­tion soft­ware (even the small­est OSS ERP provider can write its ver­sion of SAP Duet), and more.

Appar­ently when it crossed all the t’s and dot­ted all of the i’s on the agree­ment Microsoft made with a free-software-oriented orga­ni­za­tion called the Pro­to­col Infor­ma­tion Free­dom Foun­da­tion in Decem­ber 2007, it decided to just open the kimono and elim­i­nate the mid­dle man.

Can you say this means Microsoft is now open source? No, and Microsoft took time in the press con­fer­ence to spell out its intel­lec­tual prop­erty rights (licenses will be rea­son­ably avail­able but not freely avail­able). But any­one who argues about the dif­fer­ences at length (and many long-time Microbash­ers will of course) is strictly split­ting hairs.

– Den­nis Byron

Tags: , , , ,

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: