Sun speaks SOA for feds

by Dennis Byron on February 7, 2008

Sun (JAVA) ponied up some real money this week to join the Object Man­age­ment Group (OMG)-administered SOA (ser­vice ori­ented archi­tec­ture) Con­sor­tium. Other spon­sors include Cisco (CSCO), IBM (IBM), SAP (SAP) and Sparx Sys­tems. I believe BEA (BEAS) was a spon­sor when the con­sor­tium began in March 2007 but it does not seem to be listed any longer.

Sun’s press release raised two ques­tions in my mind:

The SOA Con­sor­tium is the group that said at its found­ing that it was going to go out of busi­ness in 2010 (“a closed-end oper­a­tion” was the term the OMG used). So why did Sun join now?

Who to hell is Sparx Sys­tems and what are they doing in the pool with those sharks?

The SOA Con­sor­tium says it is all about “Redi­rect­ing the indus­try con­ver­sa­tion to business-driven SOA.” I think the SOA Consortium—perhaps because of IBM’s appar­ent insti­gat­ing sponsorship—is try­ing to over­come the com­mon tech­ni­cal use of the words “ser­vices” and “archi­tec­ture,” try­ing to posi­tion SOA as a busi­ness strat­egy as part of an IBM mar­ket­ing mes­sag­ing tactic.

The bet­ter anal­ogy in my opin­ion is to com­pare two eras:

In 1995: client/server was the archi­tec­ture behind a busi­ness process re-engineering (where have you gone, Michael Ham­mer?) busi­ness strategy

In 2010: ser­vice ori­ented archi­tec­ture is the archi­tec­ture behind a busi­ness process man­age­ment (BPM) busi­ness strategy

BPR was all about using a sin­gle large mono­lithic pack­age such as SAP R/3 in an enter­prise. BPM is all about tying together mul­ti­ple pack­ages within and among enterprises.

As part of its kick off in 2007, the SOA Con­sor­tium inter­viewed CIO and CTO focus groups. I inter­preted the consortium’s find­ings in the BPR vs. BPM con­text to mean that SOA would cause a fun­da­men­tal mar­ket change for pack­aged appli­ca­tion providers. In the client/server gen­er­a­tion, sup­pli­ers gave away the plat­form (e.g., ABAP, Peo­ple­Tools) to sell the appli­ca­tion mod­ules (R/3, Peo­ple­Soft HR). Users say they expect appli­ca­tion devel­op­ers to do the oppo­site in the SOA gen­er­a­tion: give them the ser­vices (SAP ESA) if they acquire the SOA plat­form (NetWeaver).

Per­haps that’s why startup ERP SaaS provider Work­day acquired the Ireland-based Cape Clear mid­dle­ware maker this week. (Oh by the way, scratch another inde­pen­dent mid­dle­ware player off this recent list.)

The answer to why Sun is get­ting involved with this evolv­ing SOA buzz­word game seems to lie in the Sun exec­u­tive quoted in the press release. It didn’t come out of the Sun front office but from Bill Vass, pres­i­dent and COO of Sun Microsys­tems Fed­eral. So there’s prob­a­bly a tac­ti­cal U.S. gov­ern­ment oppor­tu­nity some­where in there with the pony.

As for the sec­ond ques­tion, accord­ing to an excerpt of an IDC report released as a pro­mo­tional piece by Sparx in May 2007, it is a pri­vate 10-year-old Aus­tralian soft­ware devel­op­ment tool maker that is not even that well known in Aus­tralia. Its tools are mostly deployed into mid­sized devel­op­ment orga­ni­za­tions accord­ing to the IDC article.

Sparx’s prod­uct is based around Model Dri­ven Devel­op­ment and the Uni­fied Mod­el­ing Lan­guage and is plat­form agnos­tic. That is, it works with the Eclipse/Java-oriented guys that Sparx is in the shark tank with at the OMG, as well as with Microsoft (MSFT) Visual Stu­dio and Visio.

Inter­est­ingly, I can’t find the term SOA any­where in the IDC report on Sparx? Go figure.

– Den­nis Byron

Tags: , , , , ,

Comments on this entry are closed.

{ 1 trackback }

Previous post:

Next post: