IBM with Sun Software?

by Kris_Tuttle on March 18, 2009

Less than a week after Cisco deliv­ered on their announced intent to get deeper into the cloud com­put­ing space with their own line of servers IBM is said to be in seri­ous talks to acquire Sun Microsys­tems (JAVA).  This is the just one of what should be many moves to con­sol­i­date posi­tions to address the “Com­pute 2.0″ oppor­tu­nity that blurs the lines between servers, net­works, stor­age and devices.  

Sun has blun­dered it’s way to only a 10% mar­ket share in servers but it will help put IBM firmly in the #1 spot ahead of a surg­ing HP.  It makes it clear that IBM is going to take this bat­tle seri­ously and Cisco may be sur­prised how com­pet­i­tive the old Big Blue can be if you come into their liv­ing room.   The hard­ware though is not what inter­ests us the most.

Sun would bring IBM some very strate­gic soft­ware assets.  Java occu­pies a key role in enter­prise com­put­ing and some open source prod­ucts like MySQL are king in the more open gen­eral Inter­net space.   Sun has many soft­ware prod­uct lines but for some­thing to mat­ter in the con­text of IBM it has to be big­ger than most of these.

If the deal goes through we will be espe­cially inter­ested in what IBM will do with StarOf­fice.  (An equal to Microsoft Office on Linux.)  Linux on the desk­top has yet to catch on in any main­stream way but has seen some pock­ets of suc­cess with indi­vid­u­als and gov­ern­ment orga­ni­za­tions in Europe.   In the hands of IBM it might be a very dif­fer­ent story and a very unpleas­ant out­come for Microsoft.  

The poten­tial deal would make it clear that IBM will not sit back and watch Cisco gain share in the server space but we don’t yet know if part of this is to counter grow­ing client com­put­ing influ­ence from Google and Apple and the abil­ity for Microsoft to rebuild itself on the back of Win­dows 7.

If IBM does take the ini­tia­tive with OpenOf­fice they will again occupy a promi­nent space in the client com­put­ing space, at least on the soft­ware side.  With no per­sonal com­put­ers or mobile devices they may be feel­ing that they have to do some­thing to pre­vent Google and Apple be putting down roots from the client and mobile com­put­ing spaces.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: