Credit Suisse Flips on Apollo

by Kris_Tuttle on April 23, 2009

One couldn’t help but notice the sharp drop in Apollo (APOL — $61) a few days ago in response to a down­grade from Credit Suisse.   What’s more intrigu­ing to us is the extreme change of view over a short 3 week period.

On April 1st ana­lyst Kelly Flynn felt that con­cerns post the Q2 report were “overblown” and that con­cerns and less mar­gin expan­sion were “already reflected” in val­u­a­tion.  As for con­cerns com­ing on the reg­u­la­tory front the were said to be “less cred­i­ble than [they have been] for sev­eral years given management’s obvi­ous con­struc­tive approach to edu­ca­tional qual­ity and all reg­u­la­tory issues.“  In the note the ana­lyst went on to increase esti­mates and reit­er­ate their Out­per­form rat­ing and $95 price target.

Since the report we have been see­ing mat­ters of real con­cern about Apollo and writ­ten about them right here. Because we are short the name we were pleased to see Credit Suisse come out just 20 days later on April 21st with a down­grade of the shares.  But it’s still puz­zling that now the ana­lyst feels exactly the oppo­site regard­ing reg­u­la­tory scrutiny and a slow­ing of the busi­ness going forward.

Our best guess is that the deeper you look the more prob­lems you see.  Again it’s not that the com­pany is bad but that the risk from more reg­u­la­tory scrutiny and esti­mates that look sim­ply too high argue for there being much more risk than most are fac­tor­ing in.

Thank­fully for Apollo share­hold­ers Deutche Bank joined the cheer­lead­ing sec­tion by com­ing out with a Buy rat­ing on the shares the same day as the Credit Suisse down­grade.  The ana­lyst at DB must have felt odd watch­ing the stock tank that day but able to use the well worn phrase “we loved it at $65 so we really love it down here at $60.”

Recently the cur­rent admin­is­tra­tion has been mak­ing clear noises about reform in the credit card indus­try.  This is just more evi­dence to us that the gov­ern­ment will want to know that the debt that is being piled on stu­dents by for-profit edu­ca­tional com­pa­nies is actu­ally in their best inter­ests.  Apollo has mounted a major adver­tis­ing cam­paign to keep vis­i­bil­ity and enroll­ments up but it will also ensure that they are in the sights of whomever might be inter­ested in reform­ing ques­tion­able indus­try practices.

Lastly there’s some­thing about feel that we can’t ignore with this com­pany.  From the man­age­ment com­men­tary to the web­site the com­pany comes off as a enroll­ment and degree grant­ing *machine* which can be seen as a good thing if you stand to profit from the vol­ume. It’s not very con­sis­tent with an insti­tu­tion of higher learn­ing or even a trade school.  Every­thing shouts “enroll in a pro­gram” and it can be financed with stu­dent loans.   We real­ize that Apollo Group is a real com­pany and many stu­dents and alumni get good value from their involve­ment with the com­pany.  But it seems that a many, pos­si­bly a major­ity, do not and Apollo has busi­ness prac­tices that don’t seem above reproach.

[Dis­clo­sure: As men­tioned above Research 2.0 is unabashedly short some shares of Apollo Group based on what we see as a mis-pricing of risk in the mar­ket price of the stock.]

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: