The Daily Dealing with Mr. Market

by Kris_Tuttle on June 4, 2009

The U.S. stock mar­ket has been described as “painful” by many of our col­leagues.  The recent rally left many on the side­lines.  The move up came because “things stopped get­ting worse at a faster rate” but now it may start to feel that the next stage of “things actu­ally not get­ting worse and likely to improve” isn’t quite clear enough to sup­port a fur­ther rally.

Unfor­tu­nately there is no way to pre­dict the short and medium term moves in the mar­ket.  We’d love to ignore them but no mat­ter how nar­row our stock selec­tion process they get caught up in the tide of mar­ket ebbs and flows.

As has been said for a long time, all one needs to under­stand is fear and greed and know which one is oper­at­ing at the moment.  But in this mar­ket they seem to be hand in hand and in the mar­ket every day.  Wit­ness the infla­tion debate.  While most experts actu­ally agree that there is no real evi­dence of infla­tion and cases can (and have been) made by GaveKal, Krug­man and oth­ers that we will dodge this bul­let. We may even do it in a fairly rou­tine and pre­dictable fashion.

All that rea­son­ing doesn’t mat­ter of course.  We actu­ally read a piece today from a sell-side firm (we will leave out their name to pro­tect the inno­cent — there must be some there right?) that actu­ally brought the hyper­in­fla­tion of Nazi Ger­many into the argu­ment.  Seri­ously?!?  Yes they did!

Now their piece goes on to say that their analy­sis sug­gests that we remain in a struc­tural period of tame infla­tion and they don’t think that would change.  But of course this shows up later in the piece, after the up front fear stok­ing com­ment about Nazi Ger­man hyperinflation.

This is what makes a mar­ket. That’s all fine and good but the schiz­o­phre­nia in evi­dence makes it very hard to man­age port­fo­lios.   It demands a daily analy­sis, affir­ma­tions and adjust­ments along with a healthy dose of risk management.

We are deal­ing with some pre-summer posi­tions that will have to be closed or inoc­u­lated against losses.  Palm is launch­ing the Pre this week­end and thank­fully Mr. Moss­berg has weighed in with a pretty pos­i­tive review.  He rightly points out that the appli­ca­tions are miss­ing and just a few days later Apple will be updat­ing their iPhone which may kill off some Pre enthu­si­asm.  Oth­ers have all given Pre a pretty pos­i­tive review so the stock may con­tinue to act well into the week­end.  In the short term how­ever it may well have run the course until more car­ri­ers come online and we see how the WebOS devel­ops as a plat­form.  It’s hard to have a reli­able IV on Palm but $15 is rea­son­able at the high end.

Nvidia had a pos­i­tive but muted reac­tion to the ION news­flow out of Com­pu­tex this week.  After hit­ting a high of $11.20 or so it has set­tled back to just above $10.  Investors are still very wor­ried about mar­gins and remain very much in a “show me” state of think­ing for the most part.   How­ever the com­pany has their ana­lyst meet­ing on the 16th where we expect mostly more of the same from man­age­ment but an incre­men­tally pos­i­tive recep­tion from ana­lysts who con­tinue to “dig in” to the story more and more.  IV on NVDA is $15.

The Apple story plays out just as it should and there are few sur­prises there.  This is a mas­sively over-covered stock to be sure so doesn’t require much work beyond know­ing where the IV belongs.  Right now we are at $150 and are stick­ing with it until after the summer.

Emerg­ing mar­kets have had a great run.  The group we bought (China, Brazil, Canada) is up 25% but should con­tinue to do well (per­haps not as well) for the rest of the year so not much rea­son to reeval­u­ate at this point.

Although our deci­sion could change at any time our plan is to move from 25% cash, 75% long and 20% short to 50%/50%/15% by the Sum­mer and keep a watch­ful eye on what still feels like an unset­tled market.

[Dis­clo­sure: Research 2.0 has posi­tioned in all the secu­ri­ties above that would be described as net long although some have options and other short com­po­nents involved.]

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: