<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Research 2.0 &#187; turnarounds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.research2zero.com/tag/turnarounds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.research2zero.com</link>
	<description>Sound Views in Technology Investing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 13:27:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Liz might get lucky and offer juicy returns.</title>
		<link>http://blog.research2zero.com/2009/12/liz-gets-lucky/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.research2zero.com/2009/12/liz-gets-lucky/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 13:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kris_Tuttle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fashion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[turnarounds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.research2zero.com/?p=750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t even try to predict fashion trends. Â In fact I&#8217;m not even sure if I could tell the difference between Abercrombie and American Eagle. Â They sure look the same to me. Broken brands however have offered some very good returns in the past. Â Part of the reason is the old joke that if you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>I don&#8217;t even try to predict fashion trends. Â In fact I&#8217;m not even sure if I could tell the difference between Abercrombie and American Eagle. Â They sure look the same to me.</p>
<p>Broken brands however have offered some very good returns in the past. Â Part of the reason is the old joke that if you have something out of fashion today, just put it in your closet for a few years and take it out again when it&#8217;s back in style. Â  For companies this online works if the management team knows how to revitalize the brand and drive the success down to the bottom line.</p>
<p>There have been some vivid broken brand turnarounds in the past. Â Stories like Keds and Converse come to mind. Â The biggest though was Tiffany. Â It was so broken that management was able to do an MBO and the rest was truly historic. Â Tiffany re-emerged as a global powerhouse brand again and the wealth creating was immense. Â That was a big one.</p>
<p>Recently a much smaller company, Liz Claiborne, showed up on our radar screen and certainly constitutes a broken brand from a stock perspective. (see chart) Â After a very long run the shares are back to where they started in the mid-80&#8242;s. Â Of course it&#8217;s a different company in a different world but so far management seems to be making some intelligent moves to restore some of the luster to the company.</p>
<div id="attachment_752" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 552px">
	<a rel="attachment wp-att-752" href="http://blog.research2zero.com/2009/12/02/liz-gets-lucky/lizltchart/"><img class="size-full wp-image-752" title="lizltchart" src="http://blog.research2zero.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/lizltchart.png" alt="LIZ LT Chart" width="552" height="227" /></a>
	<p class="wp-caption-text">LIZ LT Chart</p>
</div>
<p>The fortunes of LIZ peaked in 2005 with sales reaching over $4.5B and per-share profits a thread away from $3. Unfortunately the company didn&#8217;t notice that their growth rates were slowing and turning down so expenses continued to go up causing the company to make losses on still-healthy revenues over $4B. Â After that company fell right off the runway and sales have dropped to just over $3B in for the TTM. Â While the company is still making losses they have reduced expenses and understand the need to execute a turn-around strategy.</p>
<p>Most would agree that Liz Claiborne itself is somewhat of a &#8220;tired brand&#8221; but one that still can be used for a base fashion business. Â The company recently licensed the label to JC Penney who will work it for five or ten years and possibly call it their own in time. Â This transaction shifts a chunk of the business to a royalty model which will mean lower revenues but much better profits and less working capital. Â In other words, it should improve ROIC from here. Â Management is doing some other things reduce lower-margin and loss-making segments of the business as well and outlined some of this in their most recent investor conference call.</p>
<p>The Liz Claiborne company itself is a collection of brands that include Lucky Jeans, Juicy Couture and Kate Spade. Â These are the brands that need to be the engines of growth going forward. Â New brand managers have been in place in some cases and some initial results are beginning to show. Although I have no idea how well these brands may do they all seem to have some legs in them. Â In fact the prices and demand for products in these brand houses is fairly impressive. Â  Since this is an area of near-zero qualifications for me I&#8217;ll set it aside and let others comment on the brands and stores themselves.</p>
<p>Expectations for the company going forward have been reset. Â Current revenue forecasts suggest the quarterly nadir will come in June 2010 which is consistent with management commentary that the company will see a recover in the 2nd half of 2010. Â We&#8217;d simplify current consensus as expecting the company to stabilize at revenues of $2.8-2.9B and reported earnings of $0.20 &#8211; $0.40 per share.</p>
<p>The near-term opportunity is for LIZ to go from &#8220;basket case&#8221; valuation levels of TEV/Sales of below 0.5 to &#8220;decent&#8221; which affords a TEV/Sales multiple of 1-1.5x. Â Because the company is leveraged the increase in TEV would be realized mostly in terms of stock price appreciation. Â So if the company can get to &#8220;decent&#8221; they could enjoy a stock price of $20 versus the current $4. Â As another check on the price we would note that operating margins of 7-9% would be normal for a company like this executing at the mid-point of the quality range. Â If we use 8% on $2.9B and a 30% tax rate the earnings figure would be $160M which is about $1.50/share. Â  Â $20 corresponds to just over a 13 P/E multiple.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a tall price appreciation but turnarounds are not easy and this one has a few quarters to go even if all goes as planned. Â  Â LIZ doesn&#8217;t feel like a company that could approach the success of Coach (71% gross margins, 19% operating margins and a 3x TEV/Sales level) but it&#8217;s a better-than-even bet that it could get back into the pack.</p>
<p>We wrote this one up just for fun and the holiday season.</p>
<p>[Disclosures: No holdings of this stock at the time of this writing.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.research2zero.com/2009/12/liz-gets-lucky/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

